Premiere, when it works, is still slow.Īnother point to Apple. Final Cut is fast and simple and just works. This is where optimizations and just having smooth performance gives an advantage. Personal preference at the end of the day but Matti gives it to Final Cut for its ease of use. One problem for Adobe is that when you export it is rare that the colors look like how you would expect. However, once you learn them the colors look good without too much work. Final Cut has very odd tools that have a bit of a learning curve. He says there is little finesse with Lumetri’s tools. Premiere’s Lumetri panels have a great, intuitive interface but Matti doesn’t necessarily like how the adjustments actually function. Audio isn’t exactly a forte of any NLE, so assuming you aren’t doing some outrageous mixing both of these will get the job done.Ĭolor grading is going to be a debate. So, it turns into a tie even though Adobe should pull far ahead.įor audio, there isn’t too much to get into. Though, again, Matti finds it unreliable.įinal Cut has some decent effects options and you can find a decent amount of graphics options online as well. It is so popular in the industry and there are tons of plug-ins and templates you can find online. Premiere Pro is part of the Adobe suite and it is hard to deny that its connection to After Effects dramatically increases the NLE’s potential. Motion graphics gets into some other software. Point to Apple for not having glitches and being good enough. Matti points out that his new MacBook Pro with M1 Max chip didn’t need to use fans until he started using Premiere again. Plus, on newer computers, the lack of optimization can result in slower performance than expected or it pushing the computer harder than it needs. Bugs are common in Premiere Pro and could be a huge impediment to your workflow. However, a huge issue with Adobe programs is how buggy they are and lack of optimization. Generally, the verdict is that the more complicated the edit gets the harder it is to use Final Cut. It uses a standard track-based timeline structure.įinal Cut is attempting to reinvent the wheel by creating what they call a “magnetic” timeline. If you have any experience with an NLE of any type you will likely be more comfortable with Premiere Pro. This is a huge point of comparison and honestly something you are going to want to try out yourself. It can be nice, but if you ever need to get into the nitty gritty the Apple design isn’t friendly to digging around. This is likely because Adobe has an easier-to-understand file browser system that most people will be able to use.įinal Cut uses projects with library files that hold all the footage and hide some of the file structure. Kicking off with project management Matti definitely feels a lot more comfortable with Premiere Pro. If you are looking into picking an NLE then you might want to check out this video from creator Matti Haapoja which compares the software option from Apple and Adobe. It’s actually a good thing that there are a few competitive options to choose from, each with their own advantages and disadvantages so that users can pick the one that best suits them.Īmong those are two big players: Adobe Premiere Pro CC and Apple Final Cut Pro. There is a big decision that all filmmakers need to make about which NLE they should invest their time and money into for their work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |